Zone 10b fruit trees
We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Zone 10b fruit trees. Step 2 is to add a plant family, again this could be in step 4. Step 3 is to see the family has some subfamilies.
Go to the Wildlife under Flora tab, then look at the plants which are families that have only subfamilies. You would want to have two groups, one with taxa that are considered prehistoric or non-native, and one with taxa that are deemed to be more recent.
Step 4 is to keep the more recent native and extinct plant species in your database. Step 5 is to start by looking for 10 or more, then work your way down to 5. Pick the ones that match your 10 criteria.
1) the genus name in full. Check to make sure the name is unique in the plant database. When is this going to happen? Also, you may need to add species to the database.
2) the taxon in full. Check to see if there is a possible synonym.
3) the specific epithet (a variation of the taxon name).
4) a note on whether or not this species is a record or a specimen, and any description you might have in mind.
Just for information sake. There are some rare genera that I thought were well represented.
Two weeks ago I had a look at all the genera in the plants database, which showed 2,008 genera. If you look at the family gallery you'll see that some have a much larger number of species than others. I'm not sure what the deal with this is, maybe there are so few genera that some families have so few species. It's hard to know.
One thing that I've noticed, when I put genera in the lists, some genera seem to have more than one name, and some don't have any names (even if they are'species'). In some cases the'species' may only apply to one or a few genera, and most importantly, it can be very difficult to tell if a name was assigned to the genus by mistake, or whether it is a name that was in use for the family at one time, but is no longer valid.
There is also a problem with some species names. Although they are common in the literature, they are generally invalid names, and have been changed in the database. Some of these, if you are keeping the newer name, the only way to put that name in the database is to declare it a synonym, and I guess that doesn't always happen. Other names, and you will find these names frequently in the literature, were once used to describe a species, but are no longer valid, so they cannot be included in the database. And in some cases, the literature may refer to one plant, but another name is actually the one which is valid.
Well, I should start by getting back to work.
For your interest, and to give you something to do on weekends, here are the new families I found:
While the following genera have many species, there are also several that are represented